More than 60,000 new Internet Identities were created on the Internet Computer Protocol (ICP) network in the first three months of 2025, pointing to growing traction for a privacy-centric identity system that’s been gaining quiet momentum. While the figure might sound like a niche achievement in a sea of digital sign-ins, the significance runs deeper—because this isn’t just any login service. It’s the kind of authentication that skips passwords, respects user privacy, and lets people interact across apps in a way that doesn’t broadcast their data trail.
Internet Identity, the identity layer native to ICP, has long flown under the radar in broader tech circles. Yet within decentralised infrastructure circles, it’s earned a reputation for being low-friction, secure, and anonymous where it counts. Its reliance on WebAuthn—a standard supported by devices like YubiKeys, Apple Face ID, and Android fingerprint sensors—means users can authenticate themselves without having to juggle complex passwords or lean on centralised authorities. Instead of linking every interaction to an email address or a mobile number, Internet Identity uses a pseudonymous anchor that behaves like a digital ID, with each user’s interactions with apps separated by cryptographic boundaries.
The first quarter jump reflects not just idle signups but an uptick in applications that are actively using Internet Identity as their go-to onboarding solution. A handful of apps across social, finance, governance, and gaming have embedded the protocol, pushing it from a convenience to a necessity. Developers seem to favour it for its low integration overhead and end-user simplicity, while privacy-aware users are drawn to the ability to retain control without sacrificing usability.
At the centre of it all is the Internet Computer, a blockchain network developed by the DFINITY Foundation. Unlike traditional chains that lean heavily on smart contracts bolted onto existing infrastructure, ICP goes for something closer to a full-stack computing experience. It aims to host web applications directly on-chain, offering developers the ability to deploy backend and frontend code in the same environment. Internet Identity fits into this ethos cleanly: it’s a login system that runs entirely on ICP, with no need for third-party APIs or intermediaries.
The March quarter’s 60,000 milestone may seem modest when stacked against the giants of Web2, where login systems routinely handle hundreds of millions of users. Yet for a decentralised network where identity creation isn’t incentivised by airdrops or tokens, and where friction is a built-in filter against spam, that number holds more weight. These are users signing up for functionality, not handouts.
What’s striking about Internet Identity’s rise is the way it leans into user agency while making few demands on technical knowledge. Someone using a compatible device can create an anchor within seconds, and unlike traditional crypto wallets, there’s no private key to write down, no seed phrase to store, and no clunky browser extension to install. Each identity is stored in a secure enclave on the user’s device—something akin to a vault that can’t be accessed or tampered with by apps or even the device owner.
That model is resonating in unexpected corners. Take social media: several decentralised platforms running on ICP have adopted Internet Identity to ensure users can remain pseudonymous without opening the door to bots or sockpuppets. Since each app sees a different pseudonym for the same anchor, users can compartmentalise their activity. For example, the persona you use for a governance forum won’t be traceable to your profile on a photo-sharing app. That adds a layer of protection that’s not typically found in mainstream identity providers, where all activity tends to collapse into a single profile.
The same benefits are making Internet Identity attractive for financial and voting apps on the protocol. Without tying actions to personally identifiable information, these apps can offer secure access while reducing the risk of surveillance or centralised abuse. Developers also benefit from skipping the compliance overhead that usually comes with handling identity data. The credentials stay with the user, and the apps don’t store anything that can be compromised in a breach.
Much of the recent growth can be traced to community engagement, developer tooling, and ecosystem incentives that promote better app design rather than sheer user numbers. Some apps have begun rolling out features that are accessible only via Internet Identity, nudging users to adopt the system organically. Others are integrating more advanced features such as identity delegation—allowing one anchor to temporarily authorise another device or user without exposing core credentials.
The security model continues to evolve. At launch, Internet Identity relied entirely on WebAuthn, meaning you needed a device with biometric security or a hardware key. Now, multi-device support, recovery mechanisms, and delegation tools are making the service more robust and resilient. These upgrades have expanded the potential user base, opening the door to those who may not have been able to access it initially.
Developers are also discovering that Internet Identity isn’t just about who gets in, but how access can be shaped over time. Instead of a static login, the system allows for nuanced control: identities can interact differently across apps, sessions can be limited or revoked, and anchors can be split across devices. This has quietly unlocked possibilities in collaborative apps, games, and even marketplaces where traditional identity assumptions don’t hold up.
Crucially, the ICP network doesn’t monetise Internet Identity. There are no fees for creating an anchor, no subscriptions for users, and no API charges for developers. That aligns with the broader ethos of decentralised infrastructure, where cost barriers are minimised to encourage open participation. It’s also a reminder that the DFINITY Foundation’s focus remains on building public internet infrastructure rather than monetising identity data.
While other decentralised identity frameworks are still mired in consortium discussions, enterprise pilots, and regulatory hedging, Internet Identity has quietly shipped and scaled. It’s not trying to be a universal identity layer or solve every KYC problem. Instead, it’s carving out a zone where low-stakes, high-agency interaction is the priority.
That said, there’s still work to do. Wider adoption will depend on how well the service can scale, how it handles edge cases (like losing access to all devices), and whether users trust it enough to anchor their activities to a system that hides complexity but offers little handholding. Educational efforts, better onboarding flows, and clearer recovery pathways will be key if Internet Identity wants to move from an enthusiast favourite to a user staple.
Still, 60,000 anchors in a single quarter is a strong signal that users are finding value in identity systems that put them first. It’s a small but meaningful counterweight to the identity silos of Web2, and a quiet vote of confidence in a model where anonymity, usability, and control don’t have to be trade-offs. As ICP’s app ecosystem continues to grow, Internet Identity looks set to remain at the core of how users navigate it—silently, securely, and on their own terms.
Community Discussion